AS10100 UBS Group AG 🇨🇠CH
Announcing 77 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
71
25,088 (98 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
8 × /48
Upstreams
13
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS10100
- Name
- UBS Group AG
- Organisation
- UBS Group AG
- Country
- 🇨🇠CH
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2000-07-06
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 58,463 | 1,623 | 54 | CAIDA |
| AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | ðŸ‡ðŸ‡° HK | 53,509 | 539 | 218 | CAIDA |
| AS4637 Telstra International Limited | ðŸ‡ðŸ‡° HK | 46,324 | 666 | 266 | CAIDA |
| AS4657 StarHub Ltd | 🇸🇬 SG | 36,050 | 209 | 314 | CAIDA |
| AS9498 Bharti Airtel Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 33,246 | 5,107 | 40 | inferred |
| AS4755 TATA Communications (formerly VSNL) | 🇮🇳 IN | 28,598 | 2,366 | 1 | inferred |
| AS2516 KDDI Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 28,192 | 560 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS32787 Akamai (Prolexic) | 🇺🇸 US | 25,916 | 307 | 2,336 | CAIDA |
| AS703 Verizon Business - APAC | 🇺🇸 US | 518 | 49 | 39 | CAIDA |
| AS4808 China Unicom Beijing Province Network | 🇨🇳 CN | 81 | 1,527 | 54 | CAIDA |
| AS4847 China Telecom Beijing Province Network | 🇨🇳 CN | 73 | 878 | 67 | CAIDA |
| AS4812 China Telecom Shanghai Province Network | 🇨🇳 CN | 59 | 495 | 68 | CAIDA |
| AS17621 China Unicom Shanghai network | 🇨🇳 CN | 39 | 397 | 52 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4410 Credit Suisse Group | 🇨🇠CH | 0 | 6 | 264 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.