AS10594 Cutting Edge Communications, Inc. 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
17,408 (68 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS10594
- Name
- Cutting Edge Communications, Inc.
- Organisation
- Cutting Edge Communications
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 1997-09-30
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-CEC-TRANSIT
- Website
- http://www.cet.com
- PeeringDB
- net/1208
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,435 | 2,088 | 403 | CAIDA |
| AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 15,422 | 13 | 4 | inferred |
| AS16713 Northwest Open Access Network | 🇺🇸 US | 54 | 57 | 30 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,951 | 185 | 73 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,966 | 18 | 26 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇭 CH | 15,524 | 38 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,870 | 45 | 14 | CAIDA |
| AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) | 🇦🇺 AU | 569 | 201 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. | 🇨🇦 CA | 100 | 22 | 14 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS20271 | - | 0 | 4 | 169 | CAIDA |
| AS62511 DAVIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 3 | 128 | CAIDA |
| AS393777 State of WA Secretary of State | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 33 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.