AS10674 Gainesville Regional Utilities πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
8
31,488 (123 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
11
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS10674
Name
Gainesville Regional Utilities
Organisation
GRUCom
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
1997-10-21
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
ARIN::AS-GRU
PeeringDB
net/2379
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (44.4%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 5 no ROA (55.6%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 71,011 2,084 29 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,622 3,989 306 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 63,210 1,816 198 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,176 185 122 CAIDA
AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,534 345 11 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,776 45 14 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS7453 ACCELERATED DATA WORKS, INC. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2 14 104 CAIDA
AS15213 Tower Hill Insurance Group πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 5 77 CAIDA
AS397002 Sharpspring Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 40 CAIDA
AS53648 The School Board of Alachua County, Florida πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 40 CAIDA
AS32750 Gleim Internet, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 15 CAIDA
AS397696 West Networks LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 7 14 CAIDA
AS399925 City of Gainesville πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 5 13 CAIDA
AS53638 Alachua County BOCC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 12 CAIDA
AS33640 - 0 1 10 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.