AS12958 T2 Mobile LLC Moscow branch π·πΊ RU
T2 Mobile LLC. Announcing 22 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
22
100,096 (391 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS12958
- Name
- T2 Mobile LLC Moscow branch
- Organisation
- T2 Russia Network
- Country
- π·πΊ RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2000-01-26
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Tbps
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-T2RU-MR-MOSCOW
- Website
- https://msk.t2.ru/
- PeeringDB
- net/1796
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 68,462 | 110 | 201 | CAIDA |
| AS12389 PJSC Rostelecom | π·πΊ RU | 25,140 | 3,267 | 469 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom | π·πΊ RU | 23,236 | 591 | 154 | CAIDA |
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | π·πΊ RU | 22,901 | 8 | 181 | CAIDA |
| AS50384 W-IX Route Servers | π·πΊ RU | 0 | 0 | 26 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 25,553 | 64 | 27 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,229 | 45 | 27 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | π³π± NL | 20,143 | 130 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | πΉπ· TR | 646 | 90 | 27 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | π·πΊ RU | 9 | 4 | 27 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS34287 T2 Mobile LLC | π·πΊ RU | 0 | 5 | 220 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.