AS12996 Domeneshop AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO

Announcing 29 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
21
7,680 (30 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
10 Γ— /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS12996
Name
Domeneshop AS
Organisation
Domeneshop AS
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2000-02-15
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-DOMENESHOP
PeeringDB
net/5479
Exchanges
13
Facilities
6

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

29 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 71,435 2,088 112 CAIDA
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 68,721 133 368 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 66,375 3,955 187 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 18,500 1,081 1 inferred
AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 17,570 1,666 5 inferred
AS40676 Psychz Networks πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 124 486 29 CAIDA
AS42708 Glesys AB πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 106 210 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,951 185 326 CAIDA
AS5405 Inter.link GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 31,289 12 1 CAIDA
AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 27,060 3,255 17 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 24,304 59 1 CAIDA
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 23,949 0 2 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 15,524 38 26 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,870 45 25 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 34 103 30 CAIDA
AS57381 Daniel Husand πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 0 3 23 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS208045 Domeneshop AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 0 1 11 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.