AS13039 Global Village GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
8
13,312 (52 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
10
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS13039
Name
Global Village GmbH
Organisation
Global Village GmbH
Country
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2000-02-25
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-GLOBVILL
PeeringDB
net/3445
Exchanges
3
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,707 4,016 169 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 63,136 1,812 77 CAIDA
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 49,317 907 38 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 42 0 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 1 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 0 1 inferred
AS212024 Marc Schmitt πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 0 1 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd πŸ‡²πŸ‡Ύ MY 21,340 75 8 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 20,784 64 9 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 15,478 48 25 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,776 45 9 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 268 567 1 CAIDA
AS1836 green.ch AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 43 78 9 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 38 6 9 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 19 14 1 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 15 8 1 CAIDA
AS34800 Securebit AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 0 1 8 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.