AS131657 Hong Da Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. 🇹🇼 TW
Announcing 22 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
19
6,144 (24 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
3 × /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS131657
- Name
- Hong Da Storage Equipment Co., Ltd.
- Organisation
- Fast Line
- Country
- 🇹🇼 TW
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2011-07-21
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- APNIC::AS131657:AS-FASTLINE
- Website
- https://www.fast-line.tw/
- Looking glass
- https://lg.as131657.net
- PeeringDB
- net/20591
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 66,803 | 3,980 | 84 | CAIDA |
| AS17408 AboveNet Communications Taiwan | 🇹🇼 TW | 26,131 | 106 | 26 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,909 | 45 | 2 | inferred |
| AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 20,150 | 2,694 | 120 | CAIDA |
| AS199524 Gcore S.A. | 🇱🇺 LU | 445 | 453 | 285 | CAIDA |
| AS18423 RAID Networks Co., Ltd. | 🇹🇼 TW | 270 | 2 | 366 | CAIDA |
| AS134823 Sky Digital Co., Ltd. | 🇹🇼 TW | 202 | 35 | 30 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,309 | 236 | 114 | CAIDA |
| AS131630 Lazco Corporation | 🇹🇼 TW | 7 | 7 | 257 | CAIDA |
| AS38855 STUIX Route Servers | 🇹🇼 TW | 0 | 0 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.