AS132559 Gatik Business Solutions 🇮🇳 IN

Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
18
4,864 (19 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
11
transit customers observed
Customer cone
18
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS132559
Name
Gatik Business Solutions
Organisation
Deshkal Network Pvt Ltd
Country
🇮🇳 IN
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2013-01-14
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
200-300Gbps
Scope
Asia Pacific
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS132559:AS-GATIK
PeeringDB
net/11869
Exchanges
4
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

20 valid (95.2%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (4.8%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9498 Bharti Airtel Ltd. 🇮🇳 IN 28,472 5,108 1,017 CAIDA
AS18229 CtrlS 🇮🇳 IN 821 507 509 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL 🇫🇷 FR 29,315 59 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 19,297 45 48 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS4755 TATA Communications (formerly VSNL) 🇮🇳 IN 27,139 2,367 4 inferred
AS147279 OPTO COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED 🇮🇳 IN 6 16 1 CAIDA
AS140121 Hcin Networks Pvt Ltd 🇮🇳 IN 3 4 17 CAIDA
AS135702 Atri Networks And Media Pvt Ltd 🇮🇳 IN 0 6 255 CAIDA
AS141565 Puravi Elite Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 🇮🇳 IN 0 3 163 CAIDA
AS151760 Fiberupindia Private Limited 🇮🇳 IN 0 2 86 CAIDA
AS150050 Benvar Pvt Ltd 🇮🇳 IN 0 1 79 CAIDA
AS137133 Billa Broadband Network Pvt Ltd 🇮🇳 IN 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS142477 Nivid Telecom India Private Limited 🇮🇳 IN 0 6 30 CAIDA
AS132961 RGV Akshay communication Pvt. Ltd. 🇮🇳 IN 0 4 19 CAIDA
AS154678 ASIA GIGA FIBERNET PRIVATE LIMITED 🇮🇳 IN 0 4 4 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.