AS132884 Summit Communications Limited 🇧🇩 BD
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
1,585
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS132884
- Name
- Summit Communications Limited
- Organisation
- Summit Communications Limited AS132884
- Country
- 🇧🇩 BD
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2013-06-26
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 500-1000Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS132884:AS-CUSTOMERS
- PeeringDB
- net/19838
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 9
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 55,669 | 124 | 576 | CAIDA |
| AS9498 Bharti Airtel Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 24,573 | 5,124 | 4,670 | CAIDA |
| AS64049 Reliance Jio Infocomm Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 2,840 | 8 | 938 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,647 | 45 | 235 | CAIDA |
| AS141731 Max Hub Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 42 | 6 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS59378 ADN International Gateway Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 26 | 5 | 1,292 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS58656 bdHUB Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 1,484 | 25 | 2,863 | CAIDA |
| AS149994 Rego Communications Ltd | 🇧🇩 BD | 75 | 9 | 155 | CAIDA |
| AS58629 Global Fair Communications Ltd. | 🇧🇩 BD | 18 | 5 | 1,707 | CAIDA |
| AS134734 Velocity Networks Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 11 | 5 | 123 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.