AS133182 Running River Network Technology Limited 🇭🇰 HK

Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
2
512 (2 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS133182
Name
Running River Network Technology Limited
Organisation
RunRiver
Country
🇭🇰 HK
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2024-12-14
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SET-133182
PeeringDB
net/39644
Exchanges
5
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

3 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 56,283 1,574 41 CAIDA
AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. 🇯🇵 JP 22,360 237 46 CAIDA
AS17408 AboveNet Communications Taiwan 🇹🇼 TW 7,701 106 70 CAIDA
AS38182 Extreme Broadband 🇲🇾 MY 1,826 111 45 CAIDA
AS138915 Kaopu Cloud HK Limited 🇭🇰 HK 1,744 367 2 CAIDA
AS10133 Chief Telecom Inc. 🇹🇼 TW 366 0 7 CAIDA
AS151552 PT Threego Technology Indonesia 🇮🇩 ID 178 1 72 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,062 235 21 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,802 18 1 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,382 85 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 5,024 45 6 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 2 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. 🇸🇬 SG 27 68 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS136769 Guangzhou Fengyun Information Technology Co., Ltd. 🇨🇳 CN 0 2 120 CAIDA
AS154315 Guangzhou Leidianyun Technology Co Ltd 🇨🇳 CN 0 1 74 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.