AS133865 Beijing IQIYI Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 🇨🇳 CN
Announcing 34 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
26
12,032 (47 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
8 × /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS133865
- Name
- Beijing IQIYI Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
- Organisation
- IQIYI
- Country
- 🇨🇳 CN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-12-01
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Tbps
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- http://www.iq.com
- PeeringDB
- net/14264
- Exchanges
- 5
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | 🇭🇰 HK | 51,310 | 532 | 244 | CAIDA |
| AS7473 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd | 🇸🇬 SG | 47,277 | 46 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 27,060 | 1 | 1 | inferred |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 6,363 | 2,172 | 496 | CAIDA |
| AS21859 Zenlayer Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 3,737 | 1,682 | 67 | CAIDA |
| AS9808 China Mobile Backbone | 🇨🇳 CN | 264 | 14,256 | 204 | CAIDA |
| AS23724 China Telecom Beijing IDC Network | 🇨🇳 CN | 16 | 846 | 246 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,416 | 185 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd | 🇲🇾 MY | 23,537 | 75 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,865 | 45 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 273 | 567 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 5 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.