AS134578 UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 🇨🇳 CN
Announcing 15 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
15
2,048 (8 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS134578
- Name
- UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Organisation
- UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Country
- 🇨🇳 CN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-08-09
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- http://ufuwa.com
- PeeringDB
- net/30495
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 55,685 | 1,721 | 1,121 | CAIDA |
| AS135391 Aofei Data International Co., Ltd. | 🇭🇰 HK | 90 | 73 | 41 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,252 | 240 | 432 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,241 | 14 | 149 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,376 | 45 | 77 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS149628 HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 2 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS149175 UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 62 | 1,459 | CAIDA |
| AS141768 HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 11 | 166 | CAIDA |
| AS402390 Wisewave Information Technology CO., LTD | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 17 | 48 | CAIDA |
| AS137446 Highspeednet Data Services(Hongkong)Co.,Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 2 | 46 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.