AS134835 Starry Network Limited 🇭🇰 HK

Announcing 71 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
57
14,848 (58 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
14
7,978 × /48
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS134835
Name
Starry Network Limited
Organisation
Starry Network Limited
Country
🇭🇰 HK
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2015-11-25
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-STARRY
PeeringDB
net/11361
Exchanges
2
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

62 valid (87.3%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 9 no ROA (12.7%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS17676 SoftBank Corp. 🇯🇵 JP 21,957 473 641 CAIDA
AS21859 Zenlayer Inc 🇺🇸 US 3,678 1,687 164 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 1,143 21 199 CAIDA
AS43350 NForce Entertainment B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 873 90 135 CAIDA
AS138195 MOACK.Co.LTD 🇰🇷 KR 290 195 74 inferred
AS932 XNNET LLC 🇺🇸 US 167 53 873 CAIDA
AS58944 Telekomunikasi Indonesia International (HongKong) Limited 🇭🇰 HK 10 1 249 CAIDA
AS24295 PacketFabric (Japan) Co., Ltd. 🇯🇵 JP 9 8 411 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,121 185 224 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,203 18 18 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,805 45 25 CAIDA
AS61292 Blix Group AS 🇳🇴 NO 0 1 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS133846 IMLONGHAO 🇨🇳 CN 0 1 81 CAIDA
AS207338 Zhang Zongyu 🇨🇳 CN 0 0 62 inferred
AS151490 GaonIT 🇨🇳 CN 0 0 33 inferred
AS209294 Fan Zhang 🇨🇳 CN 0 1 11 CAIDA
AS153176 PT Lapak Registar Murah 🇮🇩 ID 0 1 6 CAIDA
AS213625 Xuluo Chen 🇨🇳 CN 0 1 6 CAIDA
AS213550 Jon Radel 🇺🇸 US 0 2 4 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.