AS135300 Myanmar Broadband Telecom Co., Ltd πŸ‡²πŸ‡² MM

Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
20
5,376 (21 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
1,456
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS135300
Name
Myanmar Broadband Telecom Co., Ltd
Organisation
Myanmar Broadband Telecom
Country
πŸ‡²πŸ‡² MM
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2016-04-02
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Asia Pacific
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-135300
PeeringDB
net/20434
Exchanges
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

21 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,099 185 755 CAIDA
AS23764 China Telecom Global πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 46,569 181 43 CAIDA
AS4229 Zenlayer Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 23,410 27 38 CAIDA
AS45558 Myanmar Posts and Telecommunications πŸ‡²πŸ‡² MM 23,347 8 83 CAIDA
AS10099 China Unicom Global πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 23,319 99 7 CAIDA
AS38082 True International Gateway Co., Ltd. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­ TH 3,956 30 42 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS8966 Etisalat (E&) πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ AE 46,723 48 6 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 27,007 1 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,858 45 15 CAIDA
AS21859 Zenlayer Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 3,732 1,683 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 274 567 12 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 27 68 15 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS138915 Kaopu Cloud HK Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 1,454 366 38 CAIDA
AS24429 Alibaba Cloud πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ CN 160 646 46 CAIDA
AS139804 RED PALM COMPANY LIMITED πŸ‡²πŸ‡² MM 0 1 46 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.