AS137207 Joint Universities Computer Centre Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK

Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
1,024 (4 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS137207
Name
Joint Universities Computer Centre Limited
Organisation
JUCC
Country
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2017-11-30
Network type
Educational/Research
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Asia Pacific
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS137207:AS-HARNET-RE
PeeringDB
net/27607

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 2 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS11537 Internet2 πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2,241 23 80 CAIDA
AS23855 Singapore Advanced Research and Education Network πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 1,380 2 114 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,949 45 2 CAIDA
AS20965 GEANT Vereniging πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 909 2 68 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 27 68 85 CAIDA
AS3662 Joint Universities Computer Centre Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 10 7 100 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS7651 Lingnan University πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 13 52 CAIDA
AS3363 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 12 49 CAIDA
AS4158 City University of Hong Kong πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 8 33 CAIDA
AS4528 The University of Hong Kong πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 7 30 CAIDA
AS4616 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 8 28 CAIDA
AS4605 Hong Kong Baptist University πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 11 26 CAIDA
AS3661 The Chinese University of Hong Kong πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 7 26 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.