AS137263 NETEASE HONG KONG LIMITED 🇭🇰 HK
NETEASE (HONG KONG) LIMITED. Announcing 44 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
43
16,384 (64 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS137263
- Name
- NETEASE HONG KONG LIMITED
- Organisation
- NETEASE
- Country
- 🇭🇰 HK
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-12-21
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://www.netease.com/
- PeeringDB
- net/21235
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 56,984 | 1,476 | 887 | CAIDA |
| AS21859 Zenlayer Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 3,743 | 1,682 | 108 | CAIDA |
| AS136897 Enjoyvc Cloud Group Limited. | 🇭🇰 HK | 131 | 107 | 246 | CAIDA |
| AS4635 HKIX Route Servers | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 0 | 60 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,484 | 185 | 276 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 50,941 | 18 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS8966 Etisalat (E&) | 🇦🇪 AE | 47,118 | 48 | 36 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 27,137 | 1 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS8359 MTS PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 5,847 | 436 | 31 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,871 | 45 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 273 | 567 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 11 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.