AS137922 IBOSS Inc. 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 46 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
30
8,448 (33 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
16
16 × /48
Upstreams
16
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS137922
Name
IBOSS Inc.
Organisation
iboss Asia
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2018-06-20
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-IBOSS
PeeringDB
net/17071
Exchanges
2
Facilities
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

43 valid (93.5%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 3 no ROA (6.5%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc 🇺🇸 US 56,025 124 174 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 54,923 1,555 182 CAIDA
AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. 🇭🇰 HK 50,584 532 79 CAIDA
AS4826 Vocus Connect International Backbone 🇦🇺 AU 45,167 160 84 CAIDA
AS7473 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 43,803 46 115 CAIDA
AS8452 Telecom Egypt 🇪🇬 EG 43,524 1,954 75 CAIDA
AS4755 TATA Communications (formerly VSNL) 🇮🇳 IN 23,511 2,349 82 CAIDA
AS37100 SEACOM Limited 🇲🇺 MU 22,266 10 73 CAIDA
AS17676 SoftBank Corp. 🇯🇵 JP 21,866 473 130 CAIDA
AS7474 SingTel Optus Pty Ltd 🇦🇺 AU 21,561 158 51 CAIDA
AS38195 Superloop 🇦🇺 AU 18,632 149 220 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,409 1,080 125 CAIDA
AS8529 Zain Omantel International FZ-LLC 🇦🇪 AE 5,271 30 74 CAIDA
AS21859 Zenlayer Inc 🇺🇸 US 3,620 1,687 80 CAIDA
AS4455 IX Reach Ltd 🇬🇧 GB 153 46 12 CAIDA
AS140641 YOTTA NETWORK SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED 🇮🇳 IN 70 183 290 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,747 45 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.