AS138064 PT. Jinom Network Indonesia 🇮🇩 ID
Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
10
2,560 (10 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS138064
- Name
- PT. Jinom Network Indonesia
- Organisation
- Jinom Network Indonesia
- Country
- 🇮🇩 ID
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-08-14
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS138064:AS-JINOM-ID
- Website
- https://jinom.net/
- Looking glass
- https://lg.jinom.net/
- PeeringDB
- net/20231
- Exchanges
- 9
- Facilities
- 6
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS7713 PT Telkom Indonesia Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 46,723 | 3,542 | 23 | CAIDA |
| AS9498 Bharti Airtel Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 26,309 | 5,122 | 1 | inferred |
| AS4800 PT Aplikanusa Lintasarta | 🇮🇩 ID | 5,887 | 719 | 238 | CAIDA |
| AS24534 PT Trans Hybrid Communication | 🇮🇩 ID | 491 | 16 | 133 | CAIDA |
| AS9905 PT Link Net Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 125 | 91 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS17451 Biznet Networks | 🇮🇩 ID | 114 | 438 | 20 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS8966 Etisalat (E&) | 🇦🇪 AE | 46,644 | 48 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 26,894 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd | 🇲🇾 MY | 23,501 | 75 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,768 | 45 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS63516 Transhybrid Internet Xchange | 🇮🇩 ID | 3 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.