AS138384 Rakuten Mobile Network, Inc. 🇯🇵 JP
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.. Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
31
420,864 (1,644 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
256 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS138384
- Name
- Rakuten Mobile Network, Inc.
- Organisation
- Rakuten Mobile
- Country
- 🇯🇵 JP
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-10-26
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- APNIC::AS138384:AS-RMI
- PeeringDB
- net/19499
- Exchanges
- 8
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,916 | 2,084 | 365 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 56,157 | 1,573 | 444 | CAIDA |
| AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 22,296 | 237 | 429 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,953 | 235 | 307 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 28,211 | 85 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,031 | 45 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 272 | 567 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 41 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS23820 Rakuten Group, Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 2 | 11 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS10012 Rakuten Mobile, Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 0 | 4 | 202 | CAIDA |
| AS23720 Rakuten Mobile Network, Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 0 | 3 | 159 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.