AS138926 Netpoint IT & Communications Pvt. Ltd 🇵🇰 PK
Announcing 27 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
8
2,048 (8 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
19
19 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS138926
- Name
- Netpoint IT & Communications Pvt. Ltd
- Organisation
- Netpoint IT & Communications
- Country
- 🇵🇰 PK
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2021-07-08
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS138926:AS-PEERS
- Website
- https://www.npisp.pk
- PeeringDB
- net/19364
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS17557 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited | 🇵🇰 PK | 4,061 | 1,297 | 318 | CAIDA |
| AS38264 Wateen Telecom | 🇵🇰 PK | 41 | 264 | 859 | CAIDA |
| AS23674 Nayatel (Pvt) Ltd | 🇵🇰 PK | 23 | 491 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS137561 WAYLINK | 🇵🇰 PK | 10 | 10 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS150371 Pace Telecom and Brodcasting Private Limited | 🇵🇰 PK | 6 | 25 | 39 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS137273 X1 NETWORKS (PRIVATE) LIMITED | 🇵🇰 PK | 0 | 0 | 102 | inferred |
| AS133369 Netpoint IT & Communications Pvt. Ltd | 🇵🇰 PK | 0 | 0 | 68 | inferred |
| AS142618 GH Telecom | 🇵🇰 PK | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS138910 Aero Cable Private Limited | 🇵🇰 PK | 0 | 6 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS141347 7 Star Telecom (Private) Limited | 🇵🇰 PK | 0 | 1 | 26 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.