AS139076 EnjoyVC Japan Corporation πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP

Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
20
6,656 (26 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
102
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS139076
Name
EnjoyVC Japan Corporation
Organisation
EnjoyVC Japan
Country
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2019-05-21
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-139076
PeeringDB
net/26922
Exchanges
3
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (42.9%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 12 no ROA (57.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 57,805 1,698 1,454 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 52,211 18 1 inferred
AS17676 SoftBank Corp. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 28,136 482 120 CAIDA
AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 26,875 3,268 90 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,294 236 166 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,499 85 13 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,845 45 24 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 245 567 12 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS136897 Enjoyvc Cloud Group Limited. πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 95 87 160 CAIDA
AS137443 ChangLian Network Technology Co., Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 35 19 43 CAIDA
AS398478 PEG TECH INC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 3 80 43 CAIDA
AS141167 AgotoZ HK Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 2 35 215 CAIDA
AS211392 DREAM CLOUD INNOVATION LIMITED πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 2 19 86 CAIDA
AS131950 EnjoyVC Japan Corporation πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 11 454 CAIDA
AS398993 PEG TECH INC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 50 61 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.