AS140443 PT Herza Digital Indonesia 🇮🇩 ID

Announcing 55 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
47
14,080 (55 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
8 × /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS140443
Name
PT Herza Digital Indonesia
Organisation
Herza Cloud
Country
🇮🇩 ID
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2020-03-27
Network type
Enterprise
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-HERZA
PeeringDB
net/23703
Exchanges
24
Facilities
21

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

20 valid (36.4%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 35 no ROA (63.6%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,732 4,017 58 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,586 19 208 CAIDA
AS9505 Taiwan Internet Gateway 🇹🇼 TW 20,597 36 1 inferred
AS63927 RISE 🇭🇰 HK 255 6 146 CAIDA
AS133095 PT Pusat Fiber Indonesia 🇮🇩 ID 221 4 1,419 CAIDA
AS150506 PT Pusat Fiber Indonesia 🇮🇩 ID 214 2 8 CAIDA
AS18059 PT Dwi Tunggal Putra 🇮🇩 ID 24 108 783 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,577 235 77 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,781 45 58 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 270 567 5 CAIDA
AS55720 Gigabit Hosting Sdn Bhd 🇲🇾 MY 143 278 7 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. 🇸🇬 SG 27 68 9 CAIDA
AS140469 PT Wahyu Adidaya Network 🇮🇩 ID 5 7 2 CAIDA
AS134637 PT Veltratel 🇮🇩 ID 0 0 26 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS150978 CV Bekantan Jantan 🇮🇩 ID 0 3 141 CAIDA
AS150270 PT Mahkota Mas Insan Persada 🇮🇩 ID 0 3 138 CAIDA
AS206766 Travchis LLC 🇺🇸 US 0 38 94 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.