AS141389 GOIP Telecom (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. 🇸🇬 SG
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
1,792 (7 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS141389
- Name
- GOIP Telecom (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.
- Organisation
- GOIP Telecom (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.
- Country
- 🇸🇬 SG
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2020-10-30
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://goipgroup.com
- PeeringDB
- net/28473
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 11
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,507 | 3,884 | 50 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 24,679 | 1 | 1 | inferred |
| AS4229 Zenlayer Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 8,720 | 27 | 161 | CAIDA |
| AS45904 Banglalion Communications Ltd | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 0 | 43 | inferred |
| AS37989 DCS1 | 🇸🇬 SG | 0 | 2 | 6 | inferred |
| AS61292 Blix Group AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 1 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,277 | 236 | 45 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,773 | 45 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 274 | 567 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 6 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS142631 Metro Lightspeed | 🇲🇾 MY | 0 | 7 | 33 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.