AS141607 PT Gayatri Lintas Nusantara 🇮🇩 ID
Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
9
2,304 (9 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
8 × /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS141607
- Name
- PT Gayatri Lintas Nusantara
- Organisation
- Gayatri Lintas Nusantara
- Country
- 🇮🇩 ID
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2020-12-18
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 200-300Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS141607:AS-GAYATRI
- Website
- http://www.gayatri.net.id
- Looking glass
- https://lg.gayatri.net.id/
- PeeringDB
- net/28551
- Exchanges
- 7
- Facilities
- 9
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS7713 PT Telkom Indonesia Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 46,777 | 3,490 | 95 | CAIDA |
| AS138840 PT Parsaoran Global Datatrans | 🇮🇩 ID | 499 | 4 | 736 | CAIDA |
| AS64315 PT Mitra Visioner Pratama | 🇮🇩 ID | 249 | 36 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS58495 PT Parsaoran Global Datatrans | 🇮🇩 ID | 236 | 297 | 45 | CAIDA |
| AS7632 PT Link Net Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 219 | 5 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS45305 PT Lintas Data Prima | 🇮🇩 ID | 80 | 50 | 224 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS63865 PT Mataram Data Center | 🇮🇩 ID | 5 | 3 | 71 | CAIDA |
| AS149692 PT Barokah Nusantara Network | 🇮🇩 ID | 0 | 2 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS138144 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri | 🇮🇩 ID | 0 | 1 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS139381 PT Citra Berdikari Nusantara | 🇮🇩 ID | 0 | 2 | 1 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.