AS142005 NC Taiwan Co., Ltd. 🇹🇼 TW

Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
32
15,872 (62 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
11
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS142005
Name
NC Taiwan Co., Ltd.
Organisation
NC Corporation
Country
🇹🇼 TW
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2021-03-18
Network type
Content
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RADB::AS-NC-CORPORATION
PeeringDB
net/26583
Exchanges
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

32 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,554 2,075 80 CAIDA
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 68,699 130 25 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 56,390 1,623 219 CAIDA
AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc 🇺🇸 US 55,988 124 25 CAIDA
AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. 🇭🇰 HK 50,682 535 171 CAIDA
AS7018 AT&T Enterprises, LLC 🇺🇸 US 23,720 627 1 CAIDA
AS9318 SK Broadband Co Ltd 🇰🇷 KR 18,435 815 147 CAIDA
AS3462 HiNet (Chunghwa Telecom) 🇹🇼 TW 7,299 247 3 CAIDA
AS3786 LG DACOM Corporation 🇰🇷 KR 2,409 855 371 CAIDA
AS198949 Radware 🇮🇱 IL 586 251 127 CAIDA
AS132132 MyRepublic Ltd. 🇸🇬 SG 172 7 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,220 236 8 CAIDA
AS8966 Etisalat (E&) 🇦🇪 AE 45,638 49 1 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,761 1 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,774 45 1 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 1 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. 🇸🇬 SG 27 68 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.