AS149014 bo jing 🇭🇰 HK
Announcing 36 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
35
8,960 (35 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
256 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
19
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS149014
- Name
- bo jing
- Organisation
- bo jing
- Country
- 🇭🇰 HK
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2021-11-12
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 56,422 | 1,541 | 2,307 | CAIDA |
| AS21859 Zenlayer Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 3,581 | 1,687 | 35 | inferred |
| AS58879 Shanghai ruisu network technology co.,LTD | 🇨🇳 CN | 29 | 0 | 203 | CAIDA |
| AS150706 Hong Kong Zhengxing Technology Co., Ltd. | 🇭🇰 HK | 28 | 49 | 1,028 | CAIDA |
| AS137443 ChangLian Network Technology Co., Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 23 | 19 | 40 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS154309 Intelligent Cloud Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 12 | 12 | 936 | CAIDA |
| AS132813 HK AISI CLOUD COMPUTING LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 44 | 572 | CAIDA |
| AS207190 YUHONET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 13 | 228 | CAIDA |
| AS152450 ChangLian Network Technology Co., Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 7 | 128 | CAIDA |
| AS208628 ChangLian Network Technology Co.,Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 5 | 84 | CAIDA |
| AS152092 Henan Angran Cloud Computing Technology Co. Ltd | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 3 | 76 | inferred |
| AS206888 HanMing HK Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 12 | 26 | CAIDA |
| AS205512 HONG KONG ZHENG XING TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 7 | 14 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.