AS150027 Auriganet Digital Technologies Private Limited 🇮🇳 IN
Announcing 35 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
35
8,960 (35 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
43
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS150027
- Name
- Auriganet Digital Technologies Private Limited
- Organisation
- Auriganet Digital Technologies
- Country
- 🇮🇳 IN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2022-07-05
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS150027:AS-CUSTOMERS
- Website
- https://auriganet.in/
- PeeringDB
- net/31564
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS17439 NTT Communications India Pvt. Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 251 | 492 | 998 | CAIDA |
| AS149535 FIRST MILE DIGITAL PRIVATE LIMITED | 🇮🇳 IN | 46 | 17 | 992 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS133982 Excitel Broadband Private Limited | 🇮🇳 IN | 21 | 188 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS141514 Sancfil Technologies Internet Services Pvt.Ltd | 🇮🇳 IN | 17 | 50 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS134006 Sheng Li Telecom India Private Limited | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 3 | 129 | CAIDA |
| AS133232 SAMPARK ESTATES PVT. LTD. | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 9 | 128 | CAIDA |
| AS137656 Kosmic Broadband Private Limited | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 4 | 86 | CAIDA |
| AS141338 Infodex Solutions Pvt. Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 2 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS154944 Igzi Networks Private Limited | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 1 | 42 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.