AS15594 netzquadrat GmbH 🇩🇪 DE
Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
24,576 (96 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
24,576 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS15594
- Name
- netzquadrat GmbH
- Organisation
- Netzquadrat
- Country
- 🇩🇪 DE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2000-08-11
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-NQ
- Website
- https://www.netzquadrat.de/
- PeeringDB
- net/269
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS50629 LWLcom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 19,946 | 24 | 122 | inferred |
| AS13237 euNetworks GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 336 | 29 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 43 | 0 | 2 | inferred |
| AS12306 Plus.line AG | 🇩🇪 DE | 25 | 14 | 63 | CAIDA |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 14 | 6 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,262 | 240 | 65 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom | 🇷🇺 RU | 27,086 | 85 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,460 | 45 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 19,873 | 47 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 234 | 575 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS34019 Hivane Association | 🇫🇷 FR | 39 | 6 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 16 | 7 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS212024 Marc Schmitt | 🇫🇷 FR | 0 | 1 | 10 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.