AS15626 ROUTE 95 LLC πΊπΈ US
Announcing 18 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
14
4,864 (19 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
3 Γ /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS15626
- Name
- ROUTE 95 LLC
- Organisation
- ITL Company AS15626
- Country
- πΊπΈ US
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2000-08-28
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- PeeringDB
- net/17923
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35320 Eurotranstelecom Ltd | πΊπ¦ UA | 8,236 | 3 | 553 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | π§π¬ BG | 53 | 0 | 3 | inferred |
| AS8772 Netassist International EOOD | π§π¬ BG | 52 | 25 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS59729 ROUTE 95 LLC | πΊπΈ US | 13 | 17 | 277 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 56,760 | 237 | 60 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 23,712 | 45 | 13 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS56834 Koseniuk Oleksandr Volodimirovich | πΊπ¦ UA | 2 | 2 | 77 | CAIDA |
| AS202051 NETGRID HOST LTD | π¬π§ GB | 0 | 29 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS42802 Technological Business Incubator "Kharkov Technologies", public organisation | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 1 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS51387 Private Entrepreneur Pototska Olga Volodimirivna | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 1 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS41317 Sigma Software LLC | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 1 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS15800 COORDINATOR LTD | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 3 | 12 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.