AS16110 Podkarpacki.net Rafal Czarny π΅π± PL
Announcing 8 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
8
2,048 (8 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS16110
- Name
- Podkarpacki.net Rafal Czarny
- Organisation
- Podkarpacki.net
- Country
- π΅π± PL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2011-01-20
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-PODKARPACKI-NET
- Website
- http://www.podkarpacki.net
- PeeringDB
- net/11168
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | πΊπΈ US | 71,417 | 2,086 | 95 | CAIDA |
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 68,795 | 133 | 114 | CAIDA |
| AS20804 Exatel S.A. | π΅π± PL | 2,245 | 17 | 186 | CAIDA |
| AS29535 Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna | π΅π± PL | 418 | 12 | 43 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 54,416 | 185 | 40 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,865 | 45 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS208331 Grzegorz Bak trading as NetX.org.pl | π΅π± PL | 0 | 1 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS200659 Ideo Sp. z o.o. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 1 | 37 | CAIDA |
| AS211938 ww-net Elzbieta Wyczarska | π΅π± PL | 0 | 2 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS203086 Firma Handlowo Uslugowa RuszelNet Lukasz Ruszel | π΅π± PL | 0 | 2 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS202337 PROFERIS SP. Z O.O. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 1 | 14 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.