AS16740 DOXX.NET CORPORATION πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 68 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
34
8,704 (34 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
34
34 Γ— /48
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS16740
Name
DOXX.NET CORPORATION
Organisation
DOXX.NET CORPORATION
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2025-12-05

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

67 valid (98.5%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (1.5%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 72,289 2,075 541 CAIDA
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 69,907 130 511 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 63,545 1,885 598 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,577 236 888 CAIDA
AS5580 GTT Communications (APAC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,069 35 6 CAIDA
AS25145 Teknotel Telekomunikasyon Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 5 67 84 CAIDA
AS30371 GTT Americas, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 3 7 2 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 4 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 53,242 19 6 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,673 64 4 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,598 45 24 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 20,021 48 16 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 243 567 6 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 197 25 4 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 34 97 4 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 15 8 8 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 8 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 9 39 8 CAIDA
AS14907 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 11 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.