AS17675 PacketFabric (Japan) Co., Ltd. π―π΅ JP
Internap Japan Co., LTD.. Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
16
52,224 (204 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
13
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS17675
- Name
- PacketFabric (Japan) Co., Ltd.
- Organisation
- Internap Japan Co.,Ltd.
- Country
- π―π΅ JP
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2001-03-26
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- PeeringDB
- net/31515
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | πΊπΈ US | 71,104 | 2,086 | 249 | CAIDA |
| AS17676 SoftBank Corp. | π―π΅ JP | 21,868 | 473 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS2516 KDDI Corporation | π―π΅ JP | 21,857 | 562 | 266 | CAIDA |
| AS1828 PacketFabric / Unitas Global | πΊπΈ US | 20,516 | 122 | 861 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS63780 dual&Co. Inc. | π―π΅ JP | 3 | 1 | 184 | CAIDA |
| AS39855 Mod Mission Critical LLC | πΊπΈ US | 2 | 499 | 59 | CAIDA |
| AS132827 GATEWAY INC | π―π΅ JP | 0 | 46 | 129 | CAIDA |
| AS55396 NRI SecureTechnologies, Ltd | π―π΅ JP | 0 | 2 | 86 | CAIDA |
| AS141364 Bayer (South East Asia) Pte Ltd | πΈπ¬ SG | 0 | 2 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS20249 Jefferies LLC | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 53 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS18143 Mitsubishi Research Institute DCS Co.,Ltd. | π―π΅ JP | 0 | 1 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS131983 suo cablenet corporation | π―π΅ JP | 0 | 1 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS59207 SYD Office | ππ° HK | 0 | 1 | 32 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.