AS17686 ACCELIA 🇯🇵 JP
Accelia, Inc.. Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
18
107,008 (418 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS17686
- Name
- ACCELIA
- Organisation
- Accelia, Inc.
- Country
- 🇯🇵 JP
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2001-03-26
- Network type
- Content
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- JPIRR::AS-ACCELIA RADB::AS-ACCELIA
- Website
- https://www.accelia.net
- PeeringDB
- net/5838
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2516 KDDI Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 21,834 | 562 | 349 | CAIDA |
| AS2519 ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 136 | 182 | 446 | CAIDA |
| AS4713 NTT Communications Corporation (OCN) | 🇯🇵 JP | 134 | 181 | 38 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,042 | 185 | 123 | CAIDA |
| AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 26,795 | 3,255 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 6,277 | 2,168 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,780 | 45 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 274 | 567 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 19 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4693 CSK-IT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 🇯🇵 JP | 2 | 7 | 208 | CAIDA |
| AS59095 ACCELIA | 🇯🇵 JP | 0 | 1 | 42 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.