AS17686 ACCELIA 🇯🇵 JP
Accelia, Inc.. Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
18
107,008 (418 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS17686
- Name
- ACCELIA
- Organisation
- Accelia, Inc.
- Country
- 🇯🇵 JP
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2001-03-26
- Network type
- Content
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- JPIRR::AS-ACCELIA RADB::AS-ACCELIA
- Website
- https://www.accelia.net
- PeeringDB
- net/5838
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2516 KDDI Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 25,821 | 561 | 327 | CAIDA |
| AS2519 ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 139 | 182 | 445 | CAIDA |
| AS4713 NTT Communications Corporation (OCN) | 🇯🇵 JP | 133 | 183 | 57 | CAIDA |
| AS131948 FORNEXT Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 34 | 1 | 28 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 57,046 | 241 | 123 | CAIDA |
| AS12389 PJSC Rostelecom | 🇷🇺 RU | 27,743 | 3,279 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 27,576 | 1,392 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 24,049 | 45 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 243 | 575 | 19 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4693 CSK-IT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 🇯🇵 JP | 2 | 7 | 198 | CAIDA |
| AS59095 ACCELIA | 🇯🇵 JP | 0 | 1 | 42 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.