AS18126 Chubu Telecommunications Company, Inc. 🇯🇵 JP
Chubu Telecommunications Co.,Inc.. Announcing 65 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
63
1,505,536 (5,881 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
2 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS18126
- Name
- Chubu Telecommunications Company, Inc.
- Organisation
- Chubu Telecommunications Co.,Inc. (ctc)
- Country
- 🇯🇵 JP
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2002-03-21
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Tbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- JPIRR::AS-CTCX
- Website
- https://www.ctc.co.jp/
- PeeringDB
- net/1717
- Exchanges
- 8
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 57,844 | 1,706 | 784 | CAIDA |
| AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 28,490 | 258 | 470 | CAIDA |
| AS2516 KDDI Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 28,255 | 561 | 375 | CAIDA |
| AS2519 ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 🇯🇵 JP | 139 | 182 | 522 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,261 | 236 | 425 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 52,172 | 18 | 64 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,966 | 45 | 66 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 236 | 575 | 63 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS146985 KISSEI COMTEC Co.,Ltd | 🇯🇵 JP | 0 | 1 | 7 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.