AS1835 Forskningsnettet - Danish NREN 🇪🇺 EU
Forskningsnettet - Danish network for Research and Education. Announcing 8 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
164,352 (642 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
5 × /32
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS1835
- Name
- Forskningsnettet - Danish NREN
- Organisation
- Forskningsnettet
- Country
- 🇪🇺 EU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1993-09-01
- Network type
- Educational/Research
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-DEIC
- Website
- http://www.deic.dk/
- PeeringDB
- net/2962
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2603 NORDUnet | 🇩🇰 DK | 167 | 10 | 609 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,807 | 235 | 166 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS209291 Uddannelses- og Forskningsstyrelsens It | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 3 | 117 | CAIDA |
| AS204793 FORENINGEN KOLLEGIENET ODENSE | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 74 | CAIDA |
| AS62138 Aarhus Universitet | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 74 | CAIDA |
| AS210731 Forening for DotSrc | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 73 | CAIDA |
| AS198794 Thomas Steen Rasmussen | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 64 | CAIDA |
| AS5491 Jan Olsson | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 39 | CAIDA |
| AS42236 DTU Science Park a/s | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 8 | 27 | inferred |
| AS198455 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet | 🇩🇰 DK | 0 | 1 | 5 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.