AS198317 Gabriel Sulka trading as Firma Handlowo - Uslugowa KOMPEX Gabriel Sulka 🇵🇱 PL
Announcing 66 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
45
19,456 (76 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
21
9 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS198317
- Name
- Gabriel Sulka trading as Firma Handlowo - Uslugowa KOMPEX Gabriel Sulka
- Organisation
- KOMPEX
- Country
- 🇵🇱 PL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2011-12-12
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-KOMPEX
- Website
- http://www.kompex.pl
- PeeringDB
- net/11877
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS201054 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | 🇵🇱 PL | 17,923 | 0 | 328 | CAIDA |
| AS50607 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | 🇵🇱 PL | 361 | 4 | 35 | CAIDA |
| AS62081 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | 🇵🇱 PL | 328 | 0 | 297 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 46 | 0 | 24 | inferred |
| AS49102 Connected sp. z o. o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 16 | 2 | 6 | inferred |
| AS24115 Equinix IX | 🇸🇬 SG | 0 | 0 | 26 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,121 | 185 | 462 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 28,543 | 85 | 26 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,805 | 45 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS49559 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 111 | 11 | 26 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.