AS198570 Stadtnetz Bamberg Gesellschaft fuer Telekommunikation mbH 🇩🇪 DE

Announcing 42 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
18
23,808 (93 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
24
1.1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS198570
Name
Stadtnetz Bamberg Gesellschaft fuer Telekommunikation mbH
Organisation
Stadtnetz Bamberg GmbH
Country
🇩🇪 DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2012-03-12
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-STNB
PeeringDB
net/4889
Exchanges
1
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

39 valid (92.9%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 3 no ROA (7.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,602 1 974 CAIDA
AS20764 CJSC RASCOM 🇷🇺 RU 23,207 8 2 inferred
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 42 0 29 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 30 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,080 235 424 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,116 85 19 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,440 48 102 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,747 45 47 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 273 567 30 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 21 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 44 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 53 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 45 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS200119 Michael Jochen Korn 🇩🇪 DE 0 2 134 CAIDA
AS202810 Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg 🇩🇪 DE 0 3 114 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.