AS198610 Beget LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 521 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
516
220,416 (861 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
8.4 × /32
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS198610
- Name
- Beget LLC
- Organisation
- BeGet
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2012-06-25
- Network type
- Enterprise
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://beget.com
- PeeringDB
- net/9646
- Exchanges
- 6
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,042 | 185 | 51 | inferred |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,811 | 18 | 119 | CAIDA |
| AS57304 RETN Russia | 🇷🇺 RU | 25,290 | 6 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | 🇷🇺 RU | 23,557 | 8 | 15 | inferred |
| AS202984 Team-Host (Chernyshov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich) | 🇷🇺 RU | 22,187 | 11 | 18,421 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 21,375 | 40 | 1,128 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,425 | 35 | 3 | inferred |
| AS50509 Transroute.Net | 🇷🇺 RU | 805 | 4 | 1,956 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,711 | 64 | 69 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,780 | 45 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 432 | 89 | 74 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 69 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS213533 Beget LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 3 | 91 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.