AS198736 Stream Networks Ltd 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
9
14,080 (55 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
4,096 × /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
14
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS198736
Name
Stream Networks Ltd
Organisation
Stream Networks
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2012-04-26
Network type
NSP
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-STREAMNETWORKS
PeeringDB
net/8369
Exchanges
3
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

10 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 67,198 3,833 180 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 56,828 250 1 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 54,950 14 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 56,744 237 68 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 38,201 208 9 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,224 1 9 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom 🇷🇺 RU 26,138 591 9 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 23,786 45 10 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,534 64 10 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,100 47 30 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) 🇦🇺 AU 585 201 8 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 238 582 10 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 9 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 33 97 18 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 10 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 10 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 10 39 10 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.