AS199243 Alex Smith πŸ‡³πŸ‡Ώ NZ

Announcing 15 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
2
768 (3 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
13
523 Γ— /48
Upstreams
13
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS199243
Name
Alex Smith
Organisation
zl4c.at
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡Ώ NZ
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2026-04-10
Network type
Educational/Research
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS199243:AS-GEEK-NZ
PeeringDB
net/42100
Exchanges
8

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

13 valid (86.7%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 2 no ROA (13.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 52,731 235 259 inferred
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 21,537 64 2 inferred
AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 17,152 1,815 6 inferred
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 15,252 38 123 CAIDA
AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 15,150 15 3 inferred
AS212895 Johannes Ernst πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 58 5 45 inferred
AS11967 Hop179 OU πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺ EE 18 5 63 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 15 8 9 inferred
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 9 inferred
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 9 39 9 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 9 inferred
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 9 inferred
AS205794 JINZE YANG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ CN 0 0 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,712 45 11 CAIDA
AS1103 SURF B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 29 99 2 CAIDA
AS401753 BIXCE Inc πŸ‡»πŸ‡¬ VG 2 1 10 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.