AS199669 Okay-Telecom Ltd. πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
6,400 (25 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
4 Γ— /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS199669
Name
Okay-Telecom Ltd.
Organisation
ATLEX.RU
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2012-10-12
Network type
Content
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-ATLEX
Looking glass
https://lg.atlex.ru/lg/
PeeringDB
net/20249
Exchanges
4
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

11 valid (68.8%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 5 no ROA (31.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 69,810 130 6 inferred
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 53,465 18 149 CAIDA
AS57304 RETN Russia πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 24,561 6 42 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 20,819 40 130 CAIDA
AS29076 Citytelecom LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 955 80 110 CAIDA
AS199599 Telecom-Birzha, LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 116 41 33 CAIDA
AS51248 Host-Telecom.com s.r.o. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 8 20 43 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,703 236 76 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 28,473 1 1 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,483 64 13 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,600 45 15 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,531 129 2 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 19,944 33 12 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 472 90 9 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 4 9 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.