AS199752 Go-Trex Holding BV 🇳🇱 NL

Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
5
3,072 (12 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
14
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS199752
Name
Go-Trex Holding BV
Organisation
Go-Trex
Country
🇳🇱 NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2014-02-11
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS199752:AS-GO-TREX
PeeringDB
net/31980
Exchanges
4
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

6 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 66,126 3,954 61 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,850 18 1 inferred
AS43350 NForce Entertainment B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 877 90 65 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 46 0 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek 🇵🇱 PL 0 0 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,416 185 29 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,600 85 5 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,867 64 7 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 15,493 38 5 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,865 45 6 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA 🇧🇪 BE 144 49 5 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 5 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG 🇨🇭 CH 21 14 6 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 6 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 6 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON 🇫🇷 FR 10 2 6 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 6 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 2 7 6 CAIDA
AS202365 Chronos 🇹🇷 TR 0 4 5 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.