AS200185 Aruba S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT

Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
11
14,336 (56 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS200185
Name
Aruba S.p.A.
Organisation
Aruba Cloud DE
Country
🇮🇹 IT
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2013-09-13
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-ARUBADE
PeeringDB
net/17167
Exchanges
1
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

12 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 71,384 2,088 128 CAIDA
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 68,631 135 125 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 66,002 3,984 66 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 46 0 3 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek 🇵🇱 PL 0 0 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,099 185 45 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,437 85 9 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,843 64 128 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,644 48 390 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,858 45 11 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 9 CAIDA
AS1836 green.ch AG 🇨🇭 CH 45 78 10 CAIDA
AS12859 BIT BV 🇳🇱 NL 39 66 10 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 10 CAIDA
AS31034 Aruba S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 28 98 576 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 114 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 10 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.