AS200242 Ember Ana πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE

Ember Ana Reimer. Announcing 18 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
17
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
17
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS200242
Name
Ember Ana
Organisation
de.theirs
Country
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2023-01-05
Traffic levels
100-1000Mbps
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS200242:AS-CONE
Looking glass
https://lg.thei.rs
PeeringDB
net/31956
Exchanges
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

18 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,262 240 49 inferred
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,460 45 5 inferred
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 19,770 40 96 inferred
AS208453 Johan Karlsson (SweHosting) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 19,693 5 37 inferred
AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 19,689 16 12 inferred
AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 19,689 1,777 3 inferred
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 234 575 5 inferred
AS917 Misaka Network, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 206 28 106 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 43 0 10 inferred
AS21738 Rozint πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 27 9 68 inferred
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 5 inferred
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 5 inferred
AS142064 VergeTel πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί AU 5 3 58 inferred
AS59678 SYSTEM36 LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2 1 33 inferred
AS210152 Jon Vanvik trading as Vanvik Internet πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 0 2 153 inferred
AS205794 JINZE YANG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ CN 0 0 7 inferred
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 5 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.