AS201119 Icewood LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
8
2,048 (8 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
2 × /48
Upstreams
9
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS201119
- Name
- Icewood LLC
- Organisation
- ICEWOOD
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2015-01-26
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://icewood.net
- PeeringDB
- net/23447
- Exchanges
- 18
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,760 | 133 | 53 | CAIDA |
| AS9049 JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,930 | 40 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | 🇷🇺 RU | 23,333 | 8 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 21,452 | 40 | 76 | CAIDA |
| AS28917 Fiord Networks, UAB | 🇱🇹 LT | 21,079 | 6 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,112 | 132 | 52 | CAIDA |
| AS41095 IPTP LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 2,178 | 92 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS29076 Citytelecom LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 901 | 79 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS12695 LLC Digital Network | 🇷🇺 RU | 60 | 120 | 18 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,152 | 185 | 34 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,855 | 64 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,508 | 35 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,854 | 45 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 434 | 89 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 6 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.