AS201213 DARZ GmbH 🇩🇪 DE

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
5,632 (22 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
8 × /32
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS201213
Name
DARZ GmbH
Organisation
DARZ
Country
🇩🇪 DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2014-12-19
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-DARZ
Website
http://da-rz.de
Looking glass
https://test.da-rz.de
PeeringDB
net/13188
Exchanges
2
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

1 valid (11.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 8 no ROA (88.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 71,403 2,088 40 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 63,941 1,784 25 CAIDA
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG 🇩🇪 DE 52,500 910 10 CAIDA
AS8220 COLT 🇬🇧 GB 48,872 155 36 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 272 567 2 inferred
AS199524 Gcore S.A. 🇱🇺 LU 180 456 218 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 46 0 4 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,955 185 24 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,326 85 6 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,641 48 26 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,871 45 8 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 6 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 8 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 8 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 8 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS208676 OWH SE i.L. 🇩🇪 DE 0 1 41 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.