AS201650 Webguru VOF 🇳🇱 NL
Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
2,048 (8 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
14
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS201650
- Name
- Webguru VOF
- Organisation
- Webguru VOF
- Country
- 🇳🇱 NL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2014-08-25
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) | 🇳🇱 NL | 20,225 | 0 | 40 | CAIDA |
| AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) | 🇳🇱 NL | 19,743 | 21 | 130 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 43 | 0 | 7 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,761 | 240 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS4657 StarHub Ltd | 🇸🇬 SG | 35,523 | 208 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 27,786 | 1 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom | 🇷🇺 RU | 26,856 | 85 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 25,553 | 64 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,229 | 45 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 20,143 | 130 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS50629 LWLcom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 19,714 | 24 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 229 | 575 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 198 | 25 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS6696 VERIXI SA | 🇧🇪 BE | 165 | 49 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS204092 Association GRIFON | 🇫🇷 FR | 10 | 2 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | 🇳🇱 NL | 0 | 7 | 10 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.