AS201764 mgm technology partners GmbH 🇩🇪 DE
Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS201764
- Name
- mgm technology partners GmbH
- Organisation
- mgm technology partners GmbH
- Country
- 🇩🇪 DE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2014-07-23
- Network type
- Enterprise
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://www.mgm-tp.com
- Looking glass
- https://as201764.net/lg.html
- PeeringDB
- net/7048
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,844 | 2,082 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS8220 COLT | 🇬🇧 GB | 44,466 | 154 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS8767 M-net Telekommunikations GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 76 | 65 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS21413 Envia Tel GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 63 | 44 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 41 | 0 | 2 | inferred |
| AS15960 WIIT AG | 🇩🇪 DE | 3 | 4 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 14 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,909 | 235 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 28,201 | 85 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,643 | 45 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 273 | 567 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS34019 Hivane Association | 🇫🇷 FR | 38 | 6 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS212024 Marc Schmitt | 🇫🇷 FR | 0 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.