AS201789 NETOPS B.V. 🇳🇱 NL
Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS201789
- Name
- NETOPS B.V.
- Organisation
- NETOPS
- Country
- 🇳🇱 NL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2014-07-14
- Network type
- Enterprise
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-NETOPS
- Website
- https://netops.com
- PeeringDB
- net/19801
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 7
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,563 | 3,985 | 121 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,002 | 235 | 647 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 50,708 | 18 | 284 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,135 | 130 | 282 | CAIDA |
| AS59900 B-IX Route Servers | 🇧🇬 BG | 624 | 0 | 106 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,977 | 45 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS1836 green.ch AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 43 | 78 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS12459 NETOPS B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 4 | 2 | 880 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS51430 AltusHost B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 6 | 55 | 1,889 | CAIDA |
| AS136787 PacketHub S.A. | 🇵🇦 PA | 2 | 978 | 174 | CAIDA |
| AS61295 NETOPS B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 0 | 2 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS207604 United Internet Ltd. | 🇷🇸 RS | 0 | 7 | 41 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.