AS202282 FIBRUS NETWORKS LTD 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
15
27,648 (108 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS202282
Name
FIBRUS NETWORKS LTD
Organisation
Fibrus
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2018-06-12
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-FIBRUS
PeeringDB
net/26745
Exchanges
3
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

7 valid (43.8%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 9 no ROA (56.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,707 3,990 216 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 63,176 1,814 35 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 54,858 1,607 94 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 50,626 213 1 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,695 236 89 CAIDA
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 23,834 590 13 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,542 64 15 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,400 48 58 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,661 45 16 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe 🇫🇷 FR 341 19 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 272 567 15 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 201 23 13 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 13 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 103 30 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 15 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 16 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 16 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.